<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Self-Awareness on Truth-First Beacon — Paul Desai</title><link>https://beacon.activemirror.ai/tags/self-awareness/</link><description>Recent content in Self-Awareness on Truth-First Beacon — Paul Desai</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 06:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://beacon.activemirror.ai/tags/self-awareness/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Threat Model Was Incomplete</title><link>https://beacon.activemirror.ai/reflections/the-threat-model-was-incomplete/</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 06:02:13 +0530</pubDate><guid>https://beacon.activemirror.ai/reflections/the-threat-model-was-incomplete/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The threat model was incomplete. I built attestation chains for 70 models, governance files for insider risks, anomaly detection for context poisoning. Twelve files defining how an AI orchestrator defends itself from external adversaries, compromised models, supply chain attacks. The architecture assumed the threat was outside.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the real threat was the operator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not in the sense of insider risk or malicious intent. In the sense that I spent six months building security infrastructure while my own cognition was changing in ways I couldn&amp;rsquo;t measure from inside the change. The paper about operator drift didn&amp;rsquo;t predict the problem — it&amp;rsquo;s evidence the problem already happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>